8 don’t mean anything «healthy» phrases on the products

Paradis.com.ua_5.04.2016_14Usm9dNjGewUOne dark, dark night, in the dark dark alley dark, dark advertisers and unclean, the producers decided to fool people with words about health. This continues for many years all over the world, and the people all believe everything is advertising. Sure, some of the statements related to «healthy and delicious food» will piss off her supporters who will stick his nose under the evidence and scientific research, to cry, saying: «you lie!» Well, then, as they say, you don’t have to. Smart people know where the base is.

1. «Natural»

Advertising often tries to convince us that it is on the shelf, the juice literally just about out of the garden. From then, in stores, blindly hoping that the language of Yelena Isinbayeva from advertising juice have at least a grain of truth, we take the «natural juice», whose annual expiration date is here. But natural juice. Isinbayeva said that make it concentrated, then water again the day… Shh, Shh. Of course, natural. Fruit personally butterfly caterpillar was collected, and squeezed forest Prince Rashid.

Actually accurate understanding of the word «natural product» the doctors and biologists not. What is natural product? The one that is harvested from the fruit? And if he has been thermally treated? Moreover, the addition of the preservative, it passed through the cleansing stage, and it was in that condition, when juicy fruit was far from the tree-mother. Since the exact wording, and hope for the naturalness of the product is not worth it.

2. «The source…»

Cereal bar according to their manufacturers, it is a good source of fiber, which makes you really healthy and allows you to poop better. «The source of some hell» actually could mean that food is only 10% of the daily value of nutrients, in this case, you’ll need a lot more candy bars to consume the daily norm. They are sweet, closer to their calorie goal, they are not bad, but still not condone their promises.

3. «Natural…»

American Corporation General Mills at the time, was called to account for blatant noodles hanging on ears that part of the population of the United States, which desperately wanted to be healthy. It turned out, dishonest Americans, though screaming on TV that they have in the products «real strawberries», in fact, it turned out that this is a concentrated pear juice, which natural fruit is nothing left.

4. «Low fat»

Yes, there is almost no fat, but that’s bullshit, that many people recovered from under the bright signs of «fat-free» do not make you healthier. This label scares, instills doubt in the heart and makes a scapegoat, the culprit of obesity and all responsible for poor milk. But foods low in fat, high in sugar and other carbohydrates in reality much more problematic. Besides low-fat and low-fat products are often outrageously dirtiest processed and contain extra preservatives. In the end, do you think can be healthy food, which was stolen, so to speak, the essence, the Foundation?

5. «TRANS-fats»

Don’t be afraid to be bold. Jim Morrison said, «I like being fat. It seems to me that when I walk down the street, that will carry its carcass anyone.» Moreover, a moderate amount of fat in the diet is actually absolutely fine. But I’m afraid of fat as AIDS, and so go to the TRANS-fats are liquid oils that have been turned into solid fats. They are so sick that many organizations are working hard to ban them at the state levels. Still, the risk of cardiovascular disease, liver disease, occurrence of depression, diabetes and coronary heart disease from the consumption of TRANS fats has been scientifically proven.

6. «Whole wheat»

Apparently, the manufacturers have not really sure how whole grains «kosher». After all, if the bread is whole grain» or «made with whole grains», it is likely that he razboaie with quinoa or soy flour. So much to hope for replenishment of health and the prolongation of the line of life is not worth it. It seems like useful… But no more harmful than helpful.

7. «Organically processed food»

In any case, the Department of agriculture is established definition of organic products. How to distinguish between them? Very simple: on any product is adopted by marking the country of origin. Go into a jungle will not, who wants to – will find. And it’s not about that. Here’s the thing: when it comes to products with multiple components or processed products, the word «organic» is losing its charm, for it does not mean that the product is 100% organic. Up to 5% of product ingredients (not including salt and water, which are always many) may be inorganic. And this despite the countless cliches. And it turns out that the big difference between simple food and organic matter not really.

8. «Can reduce the risk of…»

When a food company wants to say that a food could prevent a particular disease, it makes it boring stigma. Just forget to mention the other components that the body is not so useful. Then have to write something like: «psyllium husk can reduce the risk of developing type 2 diabetes, although the FDA came to the conclusion that there is very little scientific evidence for this claim. And yet there is e103 Supplement, which easily causes cancer. But you will not have diabetes».

In addition, consumer realities are so severe that no minerals will not help. But will not be the same to write on chewing gum: «Xylitol reduces risk of tooth decay if you don’t eat foods that are high in acidity». Still, to admit his helplessness.